NEUROLOGY

Neuropathic pain: an overview

Neuropathic pain is a common and debilitating condition that requires thorough assessment and careful management

Dr Elaine Wallace, Clinical Fellow, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada

January 1, 2012

Article
Similar articles
  • Pain is one of the most prevalent and distressing symptoms experienced by patients with cancer and has been shown to impact significantly on the physical, emotional and functional wellbeing of patients.1 Pain is a complex phenomenon and the aetiology of pain is often multifactorial. Pain may be broadly classified into nociceptive and neuropathic categories, but many patients with cancer have mixed-pain syndromes, ie. a combination of nociceptive and neuropathic pain.

    Definition of neuropathic pain

    Neuropathic pain (NP) is defined as “pain arising as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system”.2 NP is not a single entity but encompasses a variety of different complex clinical pictures with diverse pathophysiological mechanisms. 

    No cure for NP exists and, for the majority of those with NP, the pain can persist lifelong. Comorbidities, such as depression and impaired quality of life, are common. Palliation of pain, restoration of therapeutic sleep, maintenance of function and improvements in overall quality of life remain the mainstays of treatment.3

    Causes

    Neuropathic pain can occur as a result of injury or dysfunction to peripheral nerves and posterior roots (peripheral NP), or to the spinal cord and brain (central NP).4 Rarely, if ever, can one single mechanism be claimed responsible. Many causes of NP are implicated in patients with malignancy (see Table 1).

     (click to enlarge)

    Signs and symptoms 

    The severity of NP ranges from mild discomfort to being severely debilitating, and the onset of symptoms can be sudden or slowly progress over time. Patients often find it difficult to describe the character of the pain. Classically, patients with NP complain of spontaneous pains (arise without detectable stimulation) and evoked pains (abnormal responses to stimulation [see Table 2).

     (click to enlarge)

    Assessment and diagnosis 

    A thorough pain assessment is crucial to optimal pain management interventions. Evaluation of a patient’s pain is a multidimensional process and should include:

    • A comprehensive pain history and identification of clinical features (eg. insomnia, autonomic neuropathy) that might help individualise treatment
    • A physical examination
    • Exploration of potential aetiologies/treatable conditions, eg. spinal cord compression
    • Patient education.

    The diagnosis of NP is based primarily on the history (eg. underlying disorder and distinct pain qualities) and the findings on physical examination (eg. pattern of sensory disturbance). Electromyography and nerve conduction studies may provide objective evidence of nerve injury or dysfunction.5 CT and MRI scans can facilitate specific diagnoses (eg. herniated disc, nerve infiltration by tumour).5 Pain assessment should be ongoing (occurring at regular intervals), individualised, and clearly documented so that all involved in the patient’s care understand the important issues. 

    Management

    Due to the relatively poor understanding of the underlying mechanisms and limited efficacy of traditional analgesics, NP is challenging to treat. Many treatment options are available for NP but there is no gold standard (see Table 3). A multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social approach to the treatment of NP is thus warranted. The choice of medication for each patient depends on a number of factors, including the potential for adverse effects, treatment of comorbidities (eg. depression, sleep disturbances), drug interactions, risks of misuse and abuse, and cost.6 Analgesics may vary in efficacy according to the type of NP syndrome.

     (click to enlarge)

    Guidelines for management

    The International Association for the Study of Pain recently published evidence-based guidelines on the management of NP based on synthesising results from multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs).6 Because most of the NP trials have investigated patients with post-herpetic neuralgia or painful diabetic neuropathy, much of the efficacy data that guide clinical practice are thus extrapolated from patients with non-malignant NP. Few trials have reviewed cancer-related NP. Additional consensus guidelines from the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Canadian Pain Society have also been published.7,8

    Pharmacological interventions

    Antidepressants

    Among the first-line treatments for NP are tricyclic antidepressants (TCADs) and selective serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). The efficacy of TCADs for treating a variety of NP types has been established in multiple RCTs.6,7,9,10 Secondary amines such as nortriptyline and desipramine provide pain relief comparable to amitriptyline and other tertiary amine TCADs while causing fewer adverse effects.11 TCADs are limited, however, by anti-cholinergic side-effects (eg. dry mouth, blurred vision and urinary retention), a slow onset of action (analgesia in days to weeks) and the potential for cardiac toxicity. TCADs should be started with low doses and titrated to effect and should be used with caution in the elderly. Selective SNRIs, including duloxetine and venlafaxine, have also shown consistent efficacy in NP.10,12-14

    Anti-convulsants

    Anti-convulsants such as gabapentin and pregabalin appear to be more effective in the treatment of NP than traditional anti-convulsants such as carbamazepine and sodium valproate. Pregabalin and gabapentin appear similar in terms of adverse effects, actions and efficacy, but pregabalin is reported to have a shorter onset of action (< 1 week) and dose titration can occur more rapidly.10 Dose-related dizziness and sedation are common adverse effects that can be ameliorated by starting with low doses and titrating cautiously.11 Both require dose reduction in patients with renal insufficiency.6

    Opioids

    The role of opioid analgesics in NP has been controversial. NP has been considered refractory to opioids but, more recently, much research has supported use of these agents.15-17 The extent to which pain responds to opioids varies depending on both patient and pain characteristics.18 Methadone is a synthetic opioid agonist at the µ- and ∆-receptors and an antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Its NMDA receptor antagonist properties have led to the clinical impression that methadone is of particular benefit in patients with NP.19,20 Clinical studies of tramadol, an atypical opioid analgesic, have also confirmed its effectiveness in NP.21-26

    Topical agents

    Topical agents can produce local analgesic effects, especially if the region of NP is relatively small and circumscribed. The lidocaine 5% patch is effective in the management of post-herpetic neuralgia and in patients with allodynia due to other types of peripheral NP.12,14 Because of the small amounts of lidocaine absorbed, systemic side-effects do not occur. Topical application of capsaicin appears to be effective in the management of post-herpetic neuralgia, but can cause burning, stinging and erythema and thus can be intolerable to a number of patients.27,28

    Combination therapy

    While monotherapy may be desirable for both ease of administration and reduction of potential side-effects, this approach may not achieve satisfactory analgesic control. In RCTs assessing efficacious medications for NP, typically < 50% of patients experience satisfactory pain relief.11 Burdening side-effects (including inability to tolerate treatment) are also common.11 Because no one medication is universally effective, the combination of two or more agents with different mechanisms of action to achieve synergistic pain efficacy is not uncommon. 

    Invasive treatments

    More invasive treatments such as epidural injections of local anaesthetics or corticosteroids, implantation of epidural and intrathecal drug delivery systems, neural ablative procedures and insertion of spinal cord stimulators may be considered for patients with intractable NP. 

    Non-pharmacological interventions

    Non-pharmacological treatment options in the management of NP include exercise, physiotherapy, acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Evidence supporting efficacy of these options is, however, limited.5 Psychological treatment options include relaxation/diversion, counselling and education, cognitive behavioural therapy, stress management and pain management programmes.

    Conclusion

    Neuropathic pain is a common and debilitating condition. Thorough assessment and careful management is thus required. Pain management is a continuous dynamic process. The disease state and factors that influence pain are not static. Optimal pain control in patients with NP requires an integrated approach. The array of medications and other treatment interventions with demonstrated efficacy in NP is expanding, presenting the clinician with many different options for the management of this debilitating condition.

    References

    1. Portenoy RK, Payne D, Jacobsen P. Breakthrough pain: characteristics and impact in patients with cancer. Pain 1999; 81: 129-134
    2. Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN et al. Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical research purposes. Neurology 2008; 70: 1630-1635
    3. Galluzzi KE. Managing neuropathic pain. JAOA 2007; 107: 39-48
    4. Jensen TS, Baron R. Translation of symptoms and signs into mechanisms in neuropathic pain. Pain 2003; 102:1-8
    5. Gilron I, Watson C, Cahill C, Moulin D. Neuropathic pain: a practical guide for the clinician. CMAJ 2006; 175(3): 265-275
    6. Dworkin RH, O’Connor AB, Audette J et al. Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: an overview and literature update. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85(3): S3-S14
    7. Attal N, Cruccua G, Barona R et al. EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17: 1113-1123
    8. Moulin DE, Clark AJ, Gilron I et al. Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain – consensus statement and guidelines from the Canadian Pain Society. Pain Res Manage 2007; 12: 13-21
    9. Finnerup NB, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. The evidence for pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Pain 2010; 150: 573-581
    10. Attal N, Cruccu G, Haanpää M, Hansson P et al. EFNS guidelines on pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13: 1153-1169
    11. O’Connor AB, Dworkin RH. Treatment of neuropathic pain: an overview of recent guidelines. Am J Med 2009; 122: S22-S32
    12. Dworkin RH, O’Connor AB, Backonja M et al. Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations. Pain 2007; 132: 237-251
    13. Saarto T, Wiffen PJ. Antidepressants for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007: 4: CD005454
    14. Finnerup NB, Otto M, McQuay HJ et al. Algorithm for neuropathic pain treatment: an evidence based proposal. Pain 2005; 118: 289-305
    15. Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. Efficacy of pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: an update and effect related to mechanism of drug action. Pain 1991; 63: 389-400
    16. Cherry NI, Thaler HT, Friedlander-Klar H et al. Opioid responsiveness of cancer pain syndromes caused by neuropathic or nociceptive mechanisms: a combined analysis of controlled single-dose studies. Neurology 1994; 44: 857-861
    17. Dellemijin PL, Vanneste JA. Randomised double-blind active-placebo-controlled crossover trial of intravenous fentanyl in neuropathic pain. Lancet 1997; 349: 753-758
    18. Watson CP, Watt-Watson JH, Chipman ML. Chronic non-cancer pain and the long term utility of opioids. Pain Res Manage 2004; 9: 19-24
    19. Morley JS, Bridson J, Nash TP et al. Low-dose methadone has an analgesic effect in neuropathic pain: a double-blind randomized controlled crossover trial. Palliative Medicine 2003; 17: 576-587
    20. Gagnon B, Almahrezi A, Schreier G. Methadone in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Pain Res Manag 2003; 8(3): 149-154
    21. Harati Y, Gooch C, Swenson M et al. Double-blind randomised trial of tramadol for the treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy. Neurology 1998; 50: 1842-1846
    22. Sindrup SH, Anderson G, Madsen C et al. Tramadol relieves pain and allodynia in polyneuropathy: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Pain 1999; 83: 85-90
    23. Boureau F, Legallicier P, Kabir-Ahmadi M. Tramadol in post-herpetic neuralgia; a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Pain 2003; 104: 323-331
    24. Harati Y, Gooch C, Swenson M et al. Maintenance of the long-term effectiveness of tramadol in treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications 2000; 14: 65-70
    25. Duhmke R, Cornblath D, Hollingshead J. Tramadol for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 2: CD 003726
    26. Arbaiza D, Vidal O. Tramadol in the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain. Clin Drug Invest 2007; 27(1): 75-83
    27. Bernstein JE, Korman NJ, Bickers DR et al. Topical capsaicin treatment of chronic postherpetic neuralgia. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21(2 [1]): 265-270
    28. Alper BS, Lewis PR. Treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a systematic review of the literature. J Fam Pract 2002; 51: 121
    © Medmedia Publications/Modern Medicine of Ireland 2012